หมวดหมู่ของบทความนี้จะเกี่ยวกับf gmm r 2 หากคุณกำลังเรียนรู้เกี่ยวกับf gmm r 2มาวิเคราะห์กับEOI Figueresในหัวข้อf gmm r 2ในโพสต์Gravitational Constant: Explained!นี้.
Table of Contents
ข้อมูลทั่วไปเกี่ยวกับf gmm r 2ในGravitational Constant: Explained!ล่าสุด
ที่เว็บไซต์EOIFigueresคุณสามารถอัปเดตความรู้อื่นนอกเหนือจากf gmm r 2สำหรับข้อมูลเชิงลึกที่เป็นประโยชน์มากขึ้นสำหรับคุณ ที่เว็บไซต์EOIFigueres เราอัปเดตข้อมูลใหม่และถูกต้องสำหรับผู้ใช้เสมอ, ด้วยความหวังว่าจะได้ให้บริการข้อมูลที่ดีที่สุดแก่ผู้ใช้งาน ช่วยให้คุณได้รับข้อมูลออนไลน์ที่สมบูรณ์ที่สุด.
หัวข้อที่เกี่ยวข้องกับf gmm r 2
สนับสนุนฉันใน Patreon: ค่าคงที่แรงโน้มถ่วงคืออะไร? มันมาจากไหน? ฟิสิกส์มีความสำคัญอย่างไร? มันใช้ที่ไหนนอกเหนือจากกฎแห่งความโน้มถ่วงสากล? .
ภาพบางส่วนที่เกี่ยวข้องกับหัวข้อของf gmm r 2
นอกจากการหาข่าวเกี่ยวกับบทความนี้แล้ว Gravitational Constant: Explained! คุณสามารถดูบทความเพิ่มเติมด้านล่าง
คลิกที่นี่เพื่อดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม
คำแนะนำที่เกี่ยวข้องกับf gmm r 2
#Gravitational #Constant #Explained.
physics,math,gravitational constant,Newton,Einstein,Planck,General Relativity,Big G.
Gravitational Constant: Explained!.
f gmm r 2.
เราหวังว่าข้อมูลบางส่วนที่เราให้ไว้จะเป็นประโยชน์กับคุณ ขอบคุณมากสำหรับการรับชมf gmm r 2ข่าวของเรา
Been searching for a good gravitational constant video and I've found my winner! Ultimately I was looking for one that showed the exact calculations that led to 6.67×10^(-11) but it seems no one really wants to do that calculation. This video was great anyway!
Good mathematical explanation. In science|[scientific method], an explanation requires a experiment. This video never showed the experiment to get G. It used mathematics to profess a value (and not a observation experiment). Sometimes we have to remind mathematical guys that math is not a scientific proof alone.
So how did Cavendish come up with that 6.67×10^-11 number?
Wish i can like the video more than once
Oh god .. bless u
so what is the current method of determining the value of g? why does everyone only talk about the obsolete Cavendish experiment? you all make me sick.
Thank you so much i was looking around and couldn't find anything this good.
This video was AMAZING!
?
amazing
This is the best video i have ever seen on G.
Differential calculus posits (1×10^-5) for: G = {N sqrt((0.00001 G/Newton)/(0.00001 Newton/G))}
I have been trying to calculate gravity using newton's equation but I could not find g, google adds some unnecessary stuff and is indirect. This is such a useful video.
The thing which I wanted to know : We don't know.
Interesting video! And I love how easy it was to follow along and understand :p
Einstein’s e=mc^2 says that mass is not different than energy so mass is just the concentration of energy but according to the laws of thermodynamics energy tends to spread outward. But in gravity the concentration of energy just become more concentrated so gravity must be a repulsive force but it’s an attractive force but energy tends to spread outward
woow! We don't know why G has this value, I'm like how am I suppose to learn physics like this? Thank you for sharing! Great teaching!
This has to be the greatest explanation I've ever heard to explain the constant. I
Extremely great video on physics. G irritated me for a long time and of course no one could explain in straight like that. Love you man
Do you know that G can be defined and calculated with a corpuscolar model developed by a france physicist contemporary to Newton and that Newton knew this corpuscolar model ?
Whatever works
I came to know why the value of G is this and the answer was : " we don't know" 😂😂😂 btw i loved the video & it presents information beautifully
Excellent! Thank you for your video. The clarity of your explanation is superb. I most certainly will view your other videos.
Thanks! Still unclear how exactly experimentally that value was got?
why are newtons and kg/m not equivalent. when you said that i felt like i skipped over a very important part of the lesson that wasnt there. where do i go to learn about this?
My rationale for why the value of G is because it is a quantum value for gravitational force in units of m2/kg2–a value of action constrained by Planck's length (lp) and Planck time (tp). Notice that time is not a factor because force can't be exerted within a Planck sec (there is no time within a Planck second).
Put another way it is the quanta of gravitational force (independent of time) constrained by a Planck volume of space-time.
It seems a year after this video game out, the number has changed to 6.6743 as the recommended value.
хорошо type o negative песня.
This was not what I was looking for, but I can't say I'm disappointed
thank you i didnt understand anything
What a delightfully clear and concise exploration!
@1:25 You show EFE with the constant normally written with k for kappa as 8*n*G*c^-4, the n = pi = 3.14159…, but it looks like n (that is a visible error not math error), so G = k*c^4*(8*pi)^-1. If we change c from being the speed of light in a vacuum to just v = speed constant of gravity, then we get a reasonable value of v. I am thinking this is related to the gravitational red/blue shift cause by light leaving/coming from a planet or star. Am I wrong? Other places show the power put to c as c^-2, can you be clear as to which power should be used and why?
What a wonderful and knowledge full video. G is great.
Thank you so much for this brilliant explanation. I spent years in school plugging G into equations without a care for how or why it was that value and now I know :). You've also given me something new to dig my teeth into – Planck Time! Thanks again.
So, if all we know is derived from something we do not know, all we know is that we know nothing…
Amazing explanation, I genuinely enjoyed your video! 🙂
The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE.
ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE:
Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
The gravity constant varies because of geographic location, the sun, the moon, high tide, low tide.. etc… Calculate all this and maybe quantum won't look so chaotic. Maybe if you can plunge satellite into sun, when other planets no where near. Maybe the sun can be our yardstick
'_' I love how he speaks as how we feel
So much stuff started making so much sense in my mind watching this video.
So if you put a mil in the bank, then went to Mars and back with Jeff and you’ll be filthy rich when you get home
very good thanks for explaining smart boi
That was a great explanation
Thanks 😳🙌
Man you have to work on your English more than physics
If Gs value has a large uncertainty does that mean any equation it is used in has a large uncertainty?